tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post7751353835024745282..comments2024-03-23T22:54:58.661-04:00Comments on FBC Jax Watchdogs: Joshua Autry's Response to Tim RogersFBC Jax Watchdoghttp://www.blogger.com/profile/10740366031265491559noreply@blogger.comBlogger13125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post-46419367787119829272014-06-07T21:15:46.839-04:002014-06-07T21:15:46.839-04:00Bennett - not that it matters, but it is backwards...Bennett - not that it matters, but it is backwards. Rogers' blog has 1/10th the traffic of the FBC Jax Watchdog. FBC Jax Watchdoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10740366031265491559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post-3120486247307540692014-06-07T16:36:26.966-04:002014-06-07T16:36:26.966-04:00I guess I contribute to the 6/1 advantage that TR ...I guess I contribute to the 6/1 advantage that TR has. I often check there to see what stupid thing has appeared since the last time I checked. Lumpkins' blog too. What to do, what to do? (SARCASM ALERT ON PAGE TEXT)Bennett Willishttps://www.blogger.com/profile/01200940136846753450noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post-80625721957399633862014-06-07T13:19:54.233-04:002014-06-07T13:19:54.233-04:00I can hardly see how you posting gives more visibi...I can hardly see how you posting gives more visibility as it did not have any visibility before your post. Rogers has a 6 to 1 following of your blog. That being said he will never post the truth and at least on your small blog those who wish to read the facts can get to view them.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post-1726525643830504642014-06-07T08:41:37.370-04:002014-06-07T08:41:37.370-04:00Jon: I don't believe for one moment that those...Jon: I don't believe for one moment that those who support your brother or you are being Unchristian or mean in their comments. I do believe that they were not published for the same reason yours are not, the evidence is too heavy against what Tim Rogers is saying. <br /><br />I have corresponded and read Gene Clyatt for example, and I have never seen anything in his writings but straight facts. Debbie Kaufmanhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/17748664558802779885noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post-32941321446829567732014-06-06T22:13:39.799-04:002014-06-06T22:13:39.799-04:00Jon - it is pointless to try to reason with Rogers...Jon - it is pointless to try to reason with Rogers. All you can do is sit back and enjoy the show. He is off his rocker. I just marvel at his logic, and feel sad for anyone who says "Tim Rogers is my pastor". Scary. FBC Jax Watchdoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10740366031265491559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post-1639377616962174702014-06-06T19:41:05.413-04:002014-06-06T19:41:05.413-04:00Here is the second.
You are right, if I told Jos...Here is the second. <br /><br />You are right, if I told Josh to not seek attorney’s fees he would not. Lawyers act on their clients behalf. However the organization and the people who saved me, deserve to be paid. I tried to settle with Ergun and he asked for my children then ages 6, 5, 4 to promise to not say anything against him for the rest of their lives, even after they all learned to write their names. If they ever did, Ergun would sue them. Do you think that Ergun’s request was reasonable? I owe Josh and his firm a debt that I can never repay. It would be the morally wrong thing to say they should not recoup their expenses when they win. When I was helpless, homeless, and unemployed, they rescued me. Ergun said that he would not charge me attorney’s fees only if my entire family promised to never criticize him publicly again. Moses Modelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16027355755303728808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post-24943763375280875022014-06-06T19:40:16.544-04:002014-06-06T19:40:16.544-04:00My last comment did not make it through moderation...My last comment did not make it through moderation and I am one of the subjects of the blog. So I wrote two more.<br /><br />"I have all my comments go to moderation for the simple fact that many who support your brother are not godly in their actions or words. I cannot afford to have the type of language being directed toward me being made public on my blog as I have many church members that follow my personal social media and blog."<br /><br />Then why has my comment been in moderation for 6 days?<br /><br />"From a non-legal perspective someone is suing Ergun and it is you, your brother’s lawyer."<br />Do you think the resolution is arguing from a non-legal perspective?<br />Why do you believe that Ergun should not pay attorney's fees?<br />While Ergun did not sue for statutory damages, he said he would have if he had the time. Do you think that Ergun was correct in saying that I should pay attorney’s fees and statutory damages? <br /><br />"The Christian organizations that take on cases inform everyone from the beginning that it is not “pro-Bono” to the public as they will seek reimbursement for their time and filing fees."<br />Can you cite any of these cases?<br /><br />"Dr. Caner’s “motive” is only known to him and the Lord."<br />So you do not know my motives or Caner's motives?<br />Does that conflict with your statement, "It is about the devious plan of many Calvinists to do what they can to silence one of the most formidable, vocal critics of strict Calvinism among Southern Baptists–Dr. Ergun Caner"?<br />Moses Modelhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/16027355755303728808noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post-85688571220967753772014-06-06T17:57:33.738-04:002014-06-06T17:57:33.738-04:00Looks like Rogers posted Josh's response after...Looks like Rogers posted Josh's response after it was posted here, and not unexpectedly posted his nonsensical, logically-challenged response in which he resorted to personal attack against Josh. Josh was very graceful and restrained in his response, much more so than I believe I would have been. <br /><br />Rogers is not worthy of engagement. However, I do see some good coming out of doing so. Every time he and Lumpkins post something it does nothing but damage to Caner's PR campaign, at least in the eyes of the sensible, thinking public.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post-4090921857314328642014-06-06T08:38:29.070-04:002014-06-06T08:38:29.070-04:00Anyone know what Georgia Baptist Convention is doi...Anyone know what Georgia Baptist Convention is doing with Caner in this issue?<br /><br />Seems to me that they need to step up to the plate<br /><br />Bill<br />Romans 3:25-6<br />Sola Deo GloriaAnonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post-56183050193945766232014-06-06T08:20:28.855-04:002014-06-06T08:20:28.855-04:00Anon 7:46
Caner sued both Smathers and Jon Autry....Anon 7:46<br /><br />Caner sued both Smathers and Jon Autry. The single lawsuit was split into two lawsuits. Caner lost both of them, both thrown out by the judges. Apparently they were both Calvinist (or Muslim) federal judges and didn't recognize Caner as the "Man of God".<br /><br />Smathers was represented by Kel McClanahan, and Jon Autry was represented by his brother Joshua Autry. <br /><br />The Caner vs. Autry was a true David and Goliath story.<br /><br />And David won, once again.FBC Jax Watchdoghttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10740366031265491559noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post-85212826202257465982014-06-06T08:09:16.697-04:002014-06-06T08:09:16.697-04:00Why try to reason with people who believe they wal...Why try to reason with people who believe they walk and talk with an invisible friend, that the sun stood still, that a donkey talked, that a mansion on a street of gold awaits them, that the biblical canon chosen by catholic leaders centuries ago is infallible and is the literal word of the creator, that they will live forever (after they die of course), etc. etc.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post-12928553764427100072014-06-06T07:46:40.521-04:002014-06-06T07:46:40.521-04:00I am confused. Is it Smathers or Autry. Two diff...I am confused. Is it Smathers or Autry. Two different people or am I suffering double vision? Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8384632623933772727.post-23266630228705211972014-06-06T04:31:46.544-04:002014-06-06T04:31:46.544-04:00Wow..so rational...which sadly means poor Pastor R...Wow..so rational...which sadly means poor Pastor Rogers won't understand a word of it...but good try all the same...Dougnoreply@blogger.com